Korean IPTAB and IP High Court Counsel

Korean IP Trial
and Litigation Counsel
for Foreign Associates

Support for Korean IP disputes, IPTAB trials, and IP High Court matters.Attorney-led analysis, Korean filings, and English reporting.

37,154Korean IPTAB decisions analyzed
3IPTAB, IP High Court, Supreme Court
25 yrsrepresentative attorney dispute experience
EN/KREnglish reports and Korean filings

A Korean IP Firm Built for Foreign Counsel

SODAM Patent and Law Firm is positioned for foreign associates who need more than a translation of Korean procedure. The page now presents the firm as Korean counsel for disputes, trials, appeals, evidence review, claim charts, and English reporting.

The statistical figures below are historical aggregate data from SODAM’s analysis of public Korean decisions and judgments. They are provided for issue framing and strategic discussion only, and do not guarantee any case result.

Attorney-Led Korean IP Work

For foreign associates, trust improves when the page identifies who exercises legal and technical judgment. The profile signals below are factual, conservative, and linked to the Korean source page.

Injae Yeo, Korean patent attorney

Injae Yeo

Representative Korean Patent Attorney

  • 40th Korean Patent Attorney Examination, 2003
  • LG Electronics Excellent Representative Award
  • Patent trials, IP disputes, and prosecution strategy

Korean profile page

Kyojun Seo, Korean patent attorney and attorney at law

Kyojun Seo

Representative Korean Patent Attorney and Attorney at Law

  • Korean patent attorney and attorney-at-law qualifications
  • Representative roles stated on the Korean attorney profile
  • IP trial, litigation, and legal-procedural coordination

Korean profile page

Why Foreign Associates Work with SODAM

  • Korean IP prosecution, trial, and dispute experience
  • Practical understanding of MOIP, IPTAB, and Korean IP court procedures
  • Claim-by-claim and evidence-based analysis
  • English reporting for foreign counsel
  • Direct communication with Korean patent attorneys

How We Work

1. Initial Review

We review the office action, trial petition, decision, prior art, claims, drawings, and available evidence.

2. Strategy Proposal

We identify key issues, risks, evidence gaps, amendment options, and recommended Korean response strategies.

3. Drafting and Filing

We prepare Korean filings, arguments, amendments, claim charts, opinions, and supporting materials.

4. Reporting

We provide English reports to foreign counsel and coordinate next steps according to procedural deadlines.

FAQ

Why should foreign counsel review Korean IPTAB statistics before choosing Korean counsel?
Korean IPTAB statistics help foreign counsel understand dispute patterns, likely issue focus, evidence needs, and appeal-entry judgment. They should be used as reference data, not as a prediction or guarantee of a particular case outcome.
What Korean IP disputes does SODAM handle for foreign associates?
SODAM assists with patent invalidation trials, scope confirmation trials, appeals from IPTAB decisions, trademark invalidation and cancellation matters, design invalidation matters, office action responses, and Korean IP dispute opinions.
Can SODAM communicate and report in English?
Yes. SODAM provides English communication and reporting while preparing Korean filings, evidence analysis, claim charts, and submissions through qualified Korean professionals.
What materials should be sent for an initial Korean IP dispute review?
Helpful materials include the office action, trial petition, IPTAB decision, court decision, claims, specification, drawings, cited prior art, warning letters, target product materials, and any foreign prosecution or litigation history.
Do the statistics on this page guarantee a result?
No. The statistics are historical aggregate data from public Korean decisions and judgments. Each case depends on its own claims, evidence, procedural posture, legal issues, and technical facts.

Need Korean IP Support?

Please send the office action, trial petition, IPTAB decision, court decision, claims, drawings, cited references, warning letter, or product comparison materials for a preliminary review.